Every year I lead a cohort of Bavarian International School students from the bustling platforms of Munich's Hauptbahnhof, marking the start of an immersive historical investigation that will take us to the administrative heart of the Third Reich. This station is not merely a modern transport hub for my Bavarian International School students but a site of profound historical weight that serves as our first pædagogical classroom. As we wait for our train, I gather my students to explain that this very location was where Hitler himself was assigned to guard duty for just over two weeks beginning on February 20, 1919, following his return from the Great War. It was here that he was responsible for maintaining order among the many soldiers travelling to and from Munich during a period of intense political instability. For my history students, this provides an immediate personal connection to the individual who would later reshape the world from the city we are about to visit. I show students the archival photographs of the station as it appeared on September 28, 1938, when Hitler and Mussolini met here for the historic Munich Conference. The post building seen in those images remains largely unchanged today, although it has lost one floor and now functions as a hotel. Standing in the same spot where these leaders once stood allows my students to engage in a visceral form of historical inquiry.
We discuss how the station was subsequently utilised as the starting point for the deportations of Munich's Jewish, Roma, and Sinti populations to extermination camps in the east between June 1942 and February 1945. This site is a crucial starting point for our theory of knowledge discussions regarding the layering of memory and how a single physical space can represent both the height of diplomatic theatre and the depths of human suffering.The pædagogical value of this departure point is further enhanced when I reveal to my Bavarian International School students the megalomaniac architectural plans that Nazis had for this very site. By 1938, the architect Hermann Giesler had developed a vision to replace the existing station with a structure that would have been the largest steel-frame building in the world. This new central station was to be crowned with a massive dome reaching a height of 136 metres and a diameter of 285 metres. I explain to my students that Hitler intended this dome to be higher than the twin towers of Munich's iconic Frauenkirche, which rise only 99 metres. Hitler described the planned Munich Central Station as a Monument der Technik unseres Jahrhunderts, a deliberate contrast to the Great Hall he planned for Berlin. For my students, understanding these plans is essential for grasping the scale of Nazi ambition. The station was intended to be the central nodal point for a new axis called the Grosse Straße, an eight-kilometre-long boulevard that would have been 120 metres wide. From this station, Hitler envisioned wide-gauge double-decker trains called the Breitspurbahn travelling at speeds of 250 kilometres per hour across a victorious German empire from Brest to Baku. These trains, some 1,200 metres in length, were to be equipped with hairdressers, cinemas, and even bath tubs. By examining these plans before we even board our train to Berlin, my students can begin to analyse the link between architectural gigantism and the regime's desire for total European domination.
The departure from Munich's Hauptbahnhof also allows us to reflect on the physical destruction of the city. During the war, the station was hit by 112 bomb attacks, and by February 25, 1945, train traffic had to be entirely redirected. In total, nearly two million cubic metres of enclosed space around the station were destroyed, resulting in a loss of 7.1 million Reichsmarks. When we board our modern train, I remind my students that the reconstruction of this vital link began as early as May 6, 1945, despite a desperate lack of building materials. This transition from the ruins of April 30, 1945, when American troops entered the city, to the efficient transport system they use today is a powerful testament to Germany's post-war recovery and the Suche nach Normalität. This annual journey for the Bavarian International School isn't just a trip but a methodology of discovery. By starting at the Munich Hauptbahnhof, my students are forced to recognise that history is not a static set of dates but a continuous process etched into the limestone and asphalt they walk upon. They learn that 80% of the structures in this district were damaged by the end of the war, yet the city chose to rebuild and move forward. This immersive experience justifies the logistics of my annual journey, ensuring that as we head north, my students carry with them the weight of Munich's past as they prepare to confront the ghosts of Berlin. The departure from Munich is the first stepping stone in an investigation that moves from the birthplace of the movement to the final reckoning of its collapse, a journey that ensures the lessons of the twentieth century are not just remembered by my Bavarian International School students, but felt. 
Students encounter the Great Red Star of geraniums, pink roses, and hortensias planted in the Ehrenhof, or courtyard of honour. This floral monument was originally installed by the Soviet hosts specifically for the arrival of Truman, Stalin, and Churchill. By comparing our then-and-now GIFs, students can see how this Soviet symbol has been maintained in a reunified Germany, providing a case study in the persistence of political iconography. I explain to the students that Berlin was a chaos of ruins following the heavy bombing and street fighting of April 1945, and thus Cecilienhof was selected because it offered the infrastructure, accessibility, and security needed for the Big Three. Symbolic considerations were also paramount; Potsdam was understood by the allies as the cradle of Prussian militarism, and holding the conference here was a deliberate choice to signal the final dismantling of that tradition.
The pædagogical value of being here in person is enhanced by examining the meticulously preserved details of the grounds. We stand where the 48-star American flag once flew over the entrance, a detail the museum maintained for historical accuracy during our October 20, 2020 visit. I gather the students to reflect on the words of Churchill, who presciently remarked during the summit that it would fall to a very few men to decide the kind of life that would confront several generations to come. This palace is where the foundations for the division of both Germany and Korea were laid, providing a direct link for students writing essays comparing Cold War crises. The Potsdam Declaration, issued from this very location on July 26, 1945, outlined the occupation policies for the defeated Reich, including the five Ds: demilitarisation, denazification, democratisation, decentralisation, and deindustrialisation.
Inside the palace, we begin our investigation of the 36 rooms that were renovated and refurnished by the Soviets in a matter of only a few weeks. Most of the original furniture belonging to Crown Prince Wilhelm and Cecilie had been removed and stored at the nearby Dairy. To create a stage for the world leaders, the Soviets refurnished the palace using items looted from other Potsdam residences. Each delegation was assigned a colour-coded quarter: white for the Russians, blue for the Americans, and pink for the British. For history students, this highlights the administrative mechanics of peacemaking and the nascent tensions that would define the next 45 years of European history.
We stand first in the White Salon, which was originally the music salon of the Crown Princess. During the conference, it functioned as the reception room for the Soviet delegation and was the site of a lavish buffet Stalin provided for Truman and Churchill on the first day. This room allows students to discuss the use of hospitality as a tool of soft power. We then move to the study assigned to Stalin, formerly the writing room of Cecilie. The décor here was guided by a principle of demonstrative renunciation; Stalin personally ordered the removal of superfluous bourgeois furniture to create an atmosphere of spartan power. Students observe the dark leather club chairs and the waist-high wall panelling that gave the study its masculine, imposing character. Within this room, we view the 1948 painting titled The Morning of our Fatherland by Schurpin, which depicts a country no longer ravaged by war, providing a perfect case study for students into the use of socialist realism as state propaganda under the Nazis and subsequently the Soviets.
The room assigned to Truman and his staff, formerly the smoking room of Wilhelm, provides another layer of depth. Students can still see the finely carved writing desk and the six neo-Gothic chairs upholstered in blue velvet, which were brought specifically for the conference from Babelsberg Palace. In his memoirs, Truman recorded that the Russians had done an impressive job in refitting the palace, which had served as a hospital for both German and Soviet wounded during the war. This room is where Truman received the cryptic message that babies were satisfactorily born, informing him of the successful atomic bomb test in New Mexico on July 16, 1945. For ToK students, this is the setting for a crucial investigation into the ethics of information and the internal conflict Truman faced over how to reveal this second coming in wrath to his Soviet ally.
The focus of our tour shifts to the presence of Churchill in the palace library. Churchill had a deeper personal connection to this residence than any other member of the Big Three, having met Wilhelm II during the Kaiser manoeuvres in 1906. Students examine the Tudor elements that the British Prime Minister would have found so familiar, yet we also discuss the petty diplomatic slights he endured. The Soviets insisted that Churchill enter the conference hall through a roundabout side door to avoid the appearance of privilege that the grand main staircase would have provided. This allows students to discuss how physical spaces and movement are manipulated to equalise or elevate status during international summits. Churchill was accompanied by his daughter Mary and his foreign secretary Anthony Eden, and his frustration at the progress of the conference is palpable in his final memoirs, Triumph and Tragedy. He famously confided to his physician, Lord Moran, that Joe did what he wanted after the British election results on July 26, 1945 forced Churchill's departure.
The climax of our interior investigation is the Great Hall, the actual conference room where the foundations of the post-war order were decided. Students gather around the circular table, ten feet in diameter, which was custom-made by the Lux furniture factory in Moscow because no single-piece table large enough could be found in the ruins of Berlin. This room is where the geopolitical fate of the world was determined. My students reenact the moment on July 24, 1945 at 19.30 when Truman approached Stalin after a session. Churchill watched from fifteen feet away as Truman informed Stalin of a new weapon of unusual destructive force. Stalin, the consummate actor, played his part with a serene face, merely hoping the Americans would make good use of it against the Japanese. We now know from Soviet archives that Stalin was already well-informed of the Manhattan Project through his intelligence chief Beria. This room provides a perfect environment for students to analyse the role of deception in high-stakes diplomacy.
.gif)
Over the course of more than a decade, I've taken students from the Bavarian International School on an annual journey to the heart of German history, a journey that is now immortalised in my collection of hundreds of then-and-now GIFs. These digital snapshots of my students standing where history was made serve as more than just souvenirs; they are vital pædagogical tools that bridge the gap between the static pages of a textbook and the tangible reality of the past. For our history and theory of knowledge students, these trips to Berlin aren't merely excursions but essential investigations into how a modern, cultured state can descend into the depths of barbarism and how that same state subsequently chooses to remember or erase its darkest chapters.
Our investigation usually commences on Wilhelmstraße, a street that functioned as a metonym for the German government until May 8, 1945, much as Downing Street does for the United Kingdom. Walking this stretch with my students from the Bavarian International School, we confront the literal and figurative erasure of history, as the East German regime demolished the ruins of Nazi and Prussian ministries in the early 1950s, replacing them with prefabricated apartment blocks to overwrite the citys imperialist past. A particularly poignant stop for our cohort is Wilhelmstraße 62, the former site of the Reichskolonialamt. Here, students stand before a sign that mentions the Herero people but remains pointedly silent regarding the genocide committed against them between 1904 and 1907. This site provides a crucial theory of knowledge case study, allowing my students to engage in critical historiography as they question why a state would acknowledge a people while omitting the systematic extermination of 65,000 of them.
Further south, we encounter the Reich Aviation Ministry at Wilhelmstraße 81-85, a building that survived the war virtually intact and stands today as a chilling example of what has been termed intimidation architecture. Built on the orders of Hermann Göring between 1933 and 1936, the structure was designed to overawe visitors with its 2,100 rooms and nearly seven kilometres of corridors. My students from the Bavarian International School can still see where the Nazi eagles were removed and replaced with stone cladding, yet the discipline of the architecture remains a testament to the regimes performance show of efficiency. This site is unique because it also allows us to examine the layers of Berlins history; it served as the House of Ministries for the German Democratic Republic and was the site where the East German state was founded on October 7, 1949. Inside the north loggia, we view Max Lingner's 1953 mural titled Building the Republic, which was intended as an optimistic vision of socialism but became a rigid piece of propaganda that the artist himself eventually grew to detest. This single façade allows our history students to compare the propaganda methods of two different totalitarian regimes.The Topography of Terror, situated on the former Prinz-Albrecht-Straße 8, offers an even more visceral encounter with the perpetrators. This was the administrative centre of Nazi persecution, housing the Gestapo and the SS leadership. As we stand above the excavated prison cells where 15,000 political opponents were interrogated and tortured between 1933 and 1945, the abstract concept of the desk perpetrator becomes a physical reality for my students. The site also preserves a segment of the Berlin Wall, providing a jarring visual juxtaposition of two twentieth-century dictatorships occupying the same space. For the Bavarian International School students, this proximity of terror from different eras forces a deep reflection on the nature of state power and the preservation of memory. Moving towards the Brandenburg Gate, we use our then-and-now GIFs to illustrate how the Nazis manipulated this iconic symbol for political theatre, such as the torchlight parade of 60,000 men on January 30, 1933, which signalled the dawn of a new era. We also discuss how the Nazis used the Quadriga atop the gate as a tool of propaganda during the remilitarisation of the Rhineland in March 1936. The gate later stood in the death strip between 1961 and 1989, a silent witness to the division of the city.At the Reichstag, the focus of our Bavarian International School group shifts to the fragility of democracy. Students explore the mystery of the Reichstag fire of February 27, 1933, which the Nazis used as a pretext to suspend civil rights. The physical building still bears the Cyrillic graffiti left by Soviet soldiers in May 1945, a living museum preserved by the architect Norman Foster. For my students, seeing the names of soldiers or crude messages written on the walls by the men who actually conquered the city makes the end of the fascist beast tangible. The site of Hitlers bunker, now a nondescript parking lot near Gertrud-Kolmar-Straße, offers a stark lesson in historical erasure. The East German government sought to dissolve the bunker from memory to prevent it from becoming a place of pilgrimage for right-wing extremists. By standing on this ordinary patch of asphalt, our Bavarian International School students must use their historical imagination to see the fifty-foot-deep concrete labyrinth where Hitler and Eva Braun committed suicide on April 30, 1945.Nearby, the Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe provides a profound theory of knowledge case study. Opened in 2005, the 2,711 concrete stelae create an uneasy, confusing atmosphere designed to provoke reflection on the struggle to come to terms with the past, a process known as Vergangenheitsbewältigung. Our trips also include a working visit to the House of the Wannsee Conference, which is often the intellectual peak for our history students. Here, they conduct self-guided tours, gathering information to present to their peers about the highly educated officials, eight of whom held doctorates, who sat in this luxurious villa on January 20, 1942, to coordinate the logistics of murdering eleven million people. Standing in the actual room where the meeting occurred, my students read the minutes drawn up by Adolf Eichmann, noting the camouflage language and euphemisms like evacuation used to mask mass murder.The Reichssportfeld, including the Olympic Stadium, is another vital stop for the Bavarian International School cohort. This was the site of the most spectacular propaganda exercise in Nazi history during the Summer Olympics of 1936. Students can see the Führerbalkon and the sculptures by Karl Albiker that continue to surround the stadium, providing a gateway into discussions about Aryan æsthetic ideals and the cultivation of healthy bodies for future war. Visiting the Berlin 1939-1945 Commonwealth War Graves Commission cemetery on Heerstraße provides a necessary and deeply personal counterpoint. Surrounded by 3,594 graves, eighty % of whom were aircrew killed over Germany, we reflect on the human cost of liberating Europe. This site holds a personal connection for me, as we visit the grave of my great-grandfather, John Arthur Heath. As a member of the British occupation forces who had previously fought at the Somme, he died in Berlin while working to preserve Germanys uncertain, precarious democracy after the war.At the Bendlerblock, the headquarters of the Army High Command, my students from the Bavarian International School visit the centre of the July 20, 1944, plot against Hitler. They stand in the courtyard where Claus von Stauffenberg and his co-conspirators were executed by firing squad in the dim rays of car headlights. This visit challenges students to consider the unrealistic nationalist goals of the military resistance and their failure to act until the war was lost. Our focus on the Berlin Wall at Bernauer Straße and the Stasi headquarters helps students understand the two totalitarian dictatorships that defined twentieth-century Berlin. At the former Stasi headquarters, they learn about the intensely spied-on population and the atmosphere of terror that persisted even after the Nazis were gone. The trip concludes where the war did, at Karlshorst, the site of Nazi Germanys unconditional surrender on the night of May 8, 1945. Finally, we visit Treptower Park, the most impressive monument to the Red Army and a military cemetery for 7,000 Soviet soldiers. The colossal statue of a soldier smashing a swastika while carrying a child remains one of the few places in Germany where the Nazi symbol can be seen in a public, smashed state. Experiencing these sites in person is essential for our history and theory of knowledge students at the Bavarian International School to grasp that history is a series of stepping stones rather than a set of static dates, ensuring that the lessons of the twentieth century are not just remembered, but felt.The administrative heart of the Third Reich was not just a collection of buildings but a carefully constructed stage for the performance of power. On our Bavarian International School trips, we walk the Wilhelmstraße history mile to see how the landscape was manipulated to reflect the regimes ideology. The Reich Aviation Ministry, for instance, remains a document in stone displaying the reawakened military will of the new Germany. It was designed to overawe, a goal it still achieves today as my students look up at its massive façades. Yet, within these walls, we also find stories of resistance, such as the Red Orchestra group led by Harro Schulze-Boysen, who worked within the ministry while secretly opposing the regime. This duality is a recurring theme on our tours, as we seek to uncover the hidden histories beneath the surface of the modern city. The Topography of Terror further reinforces this by documenting the institutionalisation of fear. The Gestapo card indices, which categorised citizens with coloured tabs—dark red for a communist, violet for a grumbler—illustrate the meticulous bureaucracy required to maintain a state of total surveillance. For our students, this serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of unchecked state power and the importance of protecting civil liberties.Our visit to the Olympic Stadium often sparks intense debate among the students from the Bavarian International School regarding the role of sports in political propaganda. While the 1936 Games were designed to showcase Nordic superiority, the success of Jesse Owens, a black American athlete who won four gold medals, offered a powerful rebuttal to Nazi racial theories. We discuss how the regime attempted to camouflage its anti-semitism during the Games by removing offensive signage and even including a half-Jewish athlete, Helene Mayer, in the German team as a token gesture to ward off international boycotts. This smokescreen was effective for many foreign visitors, who returned home impressed by the regimes organisation and efficiency, a fact that highlights the power of stage-managed enthusiasm to blind observers to hard realities. For theory of knowledge students, this is an excellent example of how sensory perception can be manipulated by those in power to shape a desired narrative.The personal connection to the Commonwealth War Graves Commission cemetery at Heerstraße is a vital part of the Bavarian International School history trip. Standing at the grave of John Arthur Heath, my great-grandfather, allows the students to connect with the individual human stories that are often lost in the vast statistics of the war. His journey from the battlefields of the Great War to the occupation of Berlin represents the long and difficult struggle to establish a lasting peace in Europe. The fact that he died while working to rebuild German industry and hunt down war criminals underscores the complexity of the post-war period, where former enemies had to learn to live and work alongside one another. This site provides a space for quiet reflection on the sacrifices made by thousands of British and Commonwealth personnel, many of whom remain buried in German soil.The end of our journey at Karlshorst and Treptower Park brings the students face-to-face with the symbolic and literal collapse of the Third Reich. At Karlshorst, we stand in the room where Field Marshal Wilhelm Keitel signed the unconditional surrender, an event that marked the formal end of the war in Europe. The site, now the Museum Berlin-Karlshorst, emphasises the war of annihilation and the shared suffering of all Soviet nationalities. Treptower Park, with its massive monument to the Red Army, serves as both a sign of gratitude to the Soviet liberators and a tool of Soviet soft power designed to intimidate. The Colossal statue of the soldier smashing the swastika is a powerful image of the total defeat of the Nazi regime. For our students from the Bavarian International School, these sites are the final stepping stones in an immersive investigation that moves from the administrative heart of a murderous regime to the final reckoning of its collapse. By navigating this topography of terror and memory, they become active investigators of the human heart and the traces of evil that remain among us, ensuring that the history they have experienced in Berlin stays with them long after they return to the classroom.The GIFs we produce each year are more than just digital captures; they are a record of our students engagement with the past. Seeing a student from the Bavarian International School today standing in the same spot where a victorious Soviet soldier stood in 1945 creates a powerful visual link across time. It forces us to recognise that history is not something that happened to other people in another world, but is a continuous process that shapes our own lives. The preservation of these sites, even those as nondescript as Hitlers bunker, is essential for providing future generations with the evidence they need to understand what occurred. As the director of the Topography of Terror has noted, these remnants serve a pædagogical purpose, ensuring that the documentation of Nazi crimes is substantial and accessible. Our decade of trips has shown us that there is no substitute for being there, for touching the cold stone of a ministry building or standing in the silence of a war cemetery. These experiences justify the logistics and effort required to bring our students to Berlin each year, as they provide a depth of understanding that no other form of study can replicate. The Bavarian International School remains committed to this journey of discovery, ensuring that our students continue to confront the ghosts of Berlin and learn the vital lessons they have to teach.
