Nazi delegation on October 15, 1922 in front of the guest house of the Veste (fortress).
On the left with whistle and hat is Oskar Körner, 2nd Chairman of the NSDAP, who died in the Hitler Putsch the following year. The Nazi era began in Coburg with German Day in October 1922. Coburg teacher Hans Dietrich, Gauleiter of the Deutschvolkischen Schutz- and Trutzbund (DVST) Northern Bavaria, invited the Nazi Party in Munich with Hitler and "some gentlemen of his company" in the hope that their uncompromising radicalism would increase the importance of the event. Hitler took advantage of the propagandistic opportunity to make his party known outside of Munich and drove on October 14 with a special train and about 650 SA -begleitern, equipped with mountain poles or rubber truncheons, along with a band. Accompanied by Hitler were, among others, Alfred Rosenberg, Julius Streicher, Max Amann, Fritz Sauckel, Martin Mutschmann and Otto Hellmuth. Apart from the Munich delegation, another twenty Nazi delegations from Germany came to the city. Although prohibited by the government of Upper Franconia, the SA marched in a closed train with music and flags through Coburg to the conference venue, the large hall of Hofbräugaststätten in Mohrenstraße (demolished 1971), and later to the the old Schützenhaus am Anger (demolished 1978). Greeting them were 500 to 600 counter-demonstrators- workers from Coburg and southern Thuringia- leading to street battles. There were several injured on both sides, including the police of the Coburg city police and Bavarian state police. In the evening, the main event took place in the large hall of the Hofbräugaststätte, which was crowded with about three thousand people. Hitler was one of the keynote speakers in the presence of Carl Eduard Herzog of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha and his wife Viktoria Adelheid. After him spoke Dietrich Eckart, Anton Drexler and Hermann Esser. From that time Carl Eduard was counted among the supporters and sponsors of the Nazi party. During the night of October 14-15, in Ketschendorf, a suburb of Coburg, inhabited mainly by workers, there were again serious clashes between the SA and workers. Coburg fortress from page 28 of the cigarette album Kampf ums Dritte Reich - Eine historische Bilderfolge (1933) during a commemoration of the events of October 1922 and today. On Sunday, October 15, Hitler arrived at 13.00 with his own train, with about 2,000 followers accompanying him. On the Veste a parade of the SA-Hundertschaften took place and after a short speech of Hitler the participants returned to the conference center in Coburg. After the final event in the Hofbräuhaus, at which Hitler gave another speech, the National Socialists marched with flags and music to Coburg station around 22.00. That Sunday also saw various anti-Semitic rallies by SA men. Among other things, the director of the meat factory Großmann, Abraham Friedmann, was threatened with murder. Hitler praised the "train to Coburg" in his book Mein Kampf as a landmark of the movement.
[t]he most high-profile operation for the SA came in October 1922 when Hitler and his most loyal supporters travelled to Coburg to hold a meeting. Upon arrival at the town’s station, the visit developed into a military campaign. It came as close as civilian life could to recapturing the ‘Fronterlebnis’ (the experience of fighting at the Front).Martyn Housden (52) Hitler: Study of a Revolutionary?
A year before Hitler was appointed chancellor, the spitaltor already sported this swastika.
Hitler’s most notable propaganda success in 1922 was his party’s participation in the so-called ‘German Day’ (Deutscher Tag) in Coburg on October 14–15 . Coburg, on the Thuringian border in the north of Upper Franconia and part of Bavaria for only two years, was virgin territory for the Nazis. He saw the German Day as an opportunity not to be missed. He scraped together what funds the NSDAP had to hire a special train – in itself a novel propaganda stunt – to take 800 stormtroopers to Coburg. The SA men were instructed by Hitler to ignore explicit police orders, banning a formation march with unfurled banners and musical accompaniment, and marched with hoisted swastika flags through the town. Workers lining the streets insulted them and spat at them. Nazis in turn leapt out of the ranks beating their tormentors with sticks and rubber- truncheons. A furious battle with the socialists ensued. After ten minutes of mayhem, in which they had police support, the stormtroopers triumphantly claimed the streets of Coburg as theirs. For Hitler, the propaganda victory was what counted. The German Day in Coburg went down in the party’s annals. The NSDAP had made its mark in northern Bavaria.
There was a deputation of the big-wigs in Koburg [sic] awaiting us at the station, all very solemn and proper in frock coats and top hats. But they got the shock of their lives, I can tell you, when they saw what sort of ‘accompaniment’ Herr Hitler had brought along. I was close up to them, there on the platform, and heard what they said to him.
The Judentor We must earnestly beg you to control your following! The city of Koburg explicitly forbids these men to march through the streets in rank and file with flags flying. It would be highly provocative of disorder. Our Leader was a bit astonished at this and asked for explanations. What sort of trouble, then, did they expect? They said there’s been a bit of a misunderstanding in the City over the organisation of the festival and its promoters had had to give a strict guarantee that nothing would be done in the least likely to provoke the Communists. Hitler received this with undisguised scorn. What kind of ‘patriotic’ day did they suppose could be held if the Communists were to have it all their own way! ‘Good Lord!’ he said, ‘aren’t we in Bavaria? Haven’t we the right to move about as we like?’ Whereupon he turned sharply round, much to the discomfiture of the deputation, and gave us the word to move off. We of the 3rd Company [of the SA] marched two by two into the town on both sides of the band, and sure enough soon encountered storms of abuse from the crowds on route. Hitler led and we followed. At the fire station they were ready to turn the hoses on to us, but just didn’t – at the critical moment. Stones, however, began to fly around. Then things got hotter. The Reds set upon us with iron rods and cudgels. That was going a bit too far. Hitler swung round, flourished his walking-stick (that was the signal), and we flung ourselves upon our assailants. We were unarmed save for our fists, but we put up so good a fight that within fifteen minutes not a Red was left to be seen.
So we arrived finally at the place in the centre of the city where the meeting was to be held. When it was over we formed up to betake ourselves to the Schützenhalle, a big hall on the outskirts of Koburg where we were to spend the night. On the way the former racket got up again. Hitler decided once and for all to lay this Red menace here, and gave us the word of command. We counter-attacked for all we knew. It was jolly hard work, I can tell you! They rained tiles on us from the roof and windows and tore up the cobble stones for missiles. I got a thundering blow on the head which had to be attended to before I could carry on. I only found out afterwards how serious the wound was. We reached the Schützenhalle and dossed down, without undressing, on a thin spreading of straw. Hitler turned in amongst us, on the floor like the rest. But first he set the watches, and arranged for patrols. He came in quite the old soldier over this, anxious to provide against possible surprise. I was detailed, with another man, for patrol work. Our watch began at 2 a.m. We cast around a bit at some distance from the hall and found ourselves creeping through a spinney in its neighbourhood. We caught a glitter – made cautiously in that direction. Detected two of the enemy with their party- masks off. One of them had a revolver in his belt, the other carried hand- grenades.
![]() |
| Children giving the Hitler greeting in 1936 in the marktplatz |
Heinz A. Heinz (pp. 151 ff.) Germany’s Hitler
At that time, our recipe was: if you do not want to let [us] talk of your own accord, we will use force to make you do it. [—] That battle of the force of reason versus the democracy of force lasted for two days, and after two days this reason, supported by the will of a thousand German men, came away with the victory! It was thus that the battle for this city became a milestone in the evolution of our Movement. This was the recipe we used throughout the Reich to clear the way for the National Socialist idea and thus to conquer Germany. [—]Loyalty and obedience, discipline and self-sacrifice: if the German Volk continues to devote itself to these ideals in the future as well, it will solve every problem and master every task!
Herrngasse Back then, millions might still have been able to doubt; yet who can continue today to doubt his Volk, Germany and its future? We old fighters, we know that we have always reached our goal until now! And in the future, Germany will reach its life-goal, too, for our Movement is Germany, and Germany is the National Socialist Movement!
The Nazi-era coat of arms for Coburg, from 1934-1945 and as seen in an example of stained glass. The late medieval coat of arms, depicting the head of St. Mauritius, the patron saint of the city, as a Moor, was replaced on April 30, 1934 by an SA dagger with a swastika within the pommel in a sign divided of gold and black, with over the partition line a sword and a swastika, split by black and gold. Lord Mayor Schwede wanted to emphasise the significance of the city for the early history of the Nazi movement with the forged dagger. After the war through the initiative of provisional Lord Mayor Alfred Sauerteig, the arms reverted back to the present image shown right on a manhole cover, practically unchanged since the 16th century.
The Nazi takeover of power led to a rapid increase of politically motivated violence in Coburg. On January 15, 1930 for example, Social Democrat member Franz Klingler was attacked and knocked unconscious, and Jewish citizens were increasingly attacked in public. The investigation of the city police, which soon had the reputation of being infiltrated by Nazis, generally led to no results. On August 22, 1930 SA members raided the SPD on the occasion of the Coburg visit of the former Chancellor Hermann Müller. A climax of the attacks was on November 28 when after an SPD rally with the keynote speaker Wilhelm Hoegner the participants from Neustadt near Coburg were attacked with stones and bottles on the way back by 22 Nazis. A truck driver was hit on the head and lost control of his vehicle, which crashed down an embankment and overturned. Two people were seriously injured and fourteen injured. This time, extensive investigations were carried out by the Coburg police director Wilhelm Janzen, which ultimately led to imprisonment between three and eight months for fourteen perpetrators. After a city council resolution in January 1931 Janzen was replaced by the police inspector Scheel. In the summer of 1931, almost every night saw violence, especially in August between Nazis and Communists. The growing violence and the inability of the compliant city police to end this as well as the issue of weapons licenses for the ϟϟ leadership and Hitler's ϟϟ bodyguard, which had not been issued by the Munich police, caused the Bavarian Ministry of the Interior to act, transferring the police force in the city Coburg from March 11, 1932 to August 8, 1932 to the upper governmental council with Ernst Fritsch serving in its function as city commissioner.In January 1932, the volunteer work service of the city of Coburg was set up, the prototype of what would later be the Reich Labour Service . Unemployed male teenagers were barracked in a camp in the Wüstenahorn district for "temporary employment and education." The top guiding principle was: "No welfare support without work". For the receipt of social benefits, the personal distress of those affected was directly linked with the willingness to work in public. For their heavy physical work in building roads and settlements as well as in the quarry, the "involuntary" workers received 21 Reichsmarks per week, of which only 3.50 was actually provided whilst the rest was withheld for food, camp housing, heating and insurance. The rest was credited to a savings account. Sixty men on average were then in the camp after half a year. In the structure, this had a paramilitary order with rank order, guard services, marches and drill exercises. Offences such as denial of service resulted in dismissal. Nazi propaganda ensured that the Coburg Labour Service was made known across the Reich. Many local politicians from other communities paid visits, partly because the city's social security system was co-financed with the income of the camp.
Although often unanimous in factual issues, the corporations refused to give up their independence in favour of the Nazis. These therefore fluctuated between aggressive rejection of the connections and half-hearted cooperation. The Nazis' own student association, the National Socialist German Student Union (NSDStB) was founded in 1926 , which developed until 1931 in the university elections to the General Students Committee (AStA); Germany's strongest political force among the students. The main competitors for the NSDStB were the corporations, which counted just under 80% of all male students as their members in 1932/33, to which were added just under 200,000 old gentlemen who exerted considerable influence in the state, business and society. Although only one third of the connections against the Nazis were discontinued and many liaison students agreed with the National Socialist Weltanschauung, many corporations were skeptical or hostile to the NSDStB, since they were not affected by the ruthless power politics of the NSDStB. In the autumn and summer of 1932, numerous associations, including the DL, founded the "Hochschulpolitische Arbeitsgemeinschaft" as a counterpart to the NSDStB. With the Nazi "seizure of power," the supremacy of the NSDStB against such rival groups was cemented. Nevertheless, the organised Nazification of the "German Landsmannschaft" did not run smoothly, as the DL initially resisted the massive pressure of the NSDStB. The close personal ties between Nazi Party and NSDStB and the "German Landsmannschaft" proved to be an advantage for the Nazis however; when members of the Heidelberg corps Saxo-Borussia made fun of Hitler's table manners in May 1935, this marked the end of all student connections. The liaison students were faced with the choice of choosing between corporation or NSDStB, whereby in the future only NSDStB members could obtain state offices. From autumn 1935, one corporation broke up after the other itself. At Pentecost 1936, the DL decided to dissolve the active divisions. By 1938, all other such men's associations followed.
The Gasthaus Loreley during the Nazi era and today. In 1933, Coburg acquired the properties of Duscowerke in Uferstraße 7 and made it available to the Reichsarbeitsdienst for use as a main camp. The inauguration of a new building for the RAD group staff followed in 1937. The buildings were destroyed during the war. In 1934 the company "Verein", which was the owner and operator of the Gesellschaftshaus am Ernstplatz, had to sell its building to the non-profit Adolf Hitler Haus cooperative founded on October 14, 1933 for 60,000 Reichsmarks. The building, including a hall for about 450 people, was reconstructed according to the neoclassical plans of Reinhard Claaßen and served the following years under the name Adolf Hitler House as a representative party headquarters of the local Nazi Party. The model was the Nazi Brown House in Munich. During the battle for Coburg in April 1945, the building was destroyed and eventually demolished in 1955. In 1936-37, the city had a prestigious residential and commercial building built as part of a selective refurbishment of the new Mohrenstraße and Steinweg link. The so-called Gräfsblock was portrayed by the local Nazi propaganda as a symbol of the creative power of the new Coburg city administration. In 1937 the first home of the Hitler Youth of the newly created Gaus Bavarian Ostmark was built on Rosenauer Straße. The style of "building in the New Reich" propagated by the Nazis erected buildings with a central entrance with three portals, and cross-structures were equipped, among other things, with meeting rooms, driver's rooms and a hall of honour. Costing 133 thousand Reichsmarks, it was officially opened on December 5, 1937 in the presence of the HJ area leadership. After the war, the city youth hostel was housed in the house. There were designs by Fritz Schaller for a Thingstätte below the Bismarck Tower and from Reinhard Claassen for a monumental memorial hall for the fallen of the wars. Nazi plans of 1940 for a so-called Kreisforum on the undeveloped Judenberg, above the planned Main-Werra-Kanal as a counterpart to the opposite Coburg fortress, with a Aufmarschallee, a Aufmarschplatz for ten thousand people and a Festhalle with 3500 square meters of floor space were never realised due to the war. Nor were plans to extend Coburg's Town Hall as part of the restructuring of the Stadtsparkasse.
At
the request of mayor Franz Schwede, the Coburg city council decided on
September 23, 1932, to terminate the contract for the transfer of the
Nikolaikirche, shown here in the 1920s and today after refurbishment, as a synagogue to the Jewish community at the end of the
year. On March 16, 1933, the synagogue was closed. From 1923 the newspaper Coburger Warte published anti-Semitic articles. After being discontinued for economic reasons in January 1925, it was followed in 1926 by the Nazi party newspaper Der Weckruf as an anti-Semitic paper, designed in style and style as Der Sturmer. On January 25, 1929, the newspaper of the Central Association of German Citizens of Jewish Faith appeared in Berlin with the headline Coburg. In a full-page article Coburg was described as a stronghold and hotbed of anti-Semitic riots. Assaults against Jewish residents and their belongings were part of the agenda at that time. In March 1933, when Coburg had about 26,000 inhabitants - including 233 Jews -open terror began against Nazi critics and Jewish residents. A total of 39 Jews were arrested by the municipal emergency police and tortured. Jakob Friedmann, verbally attacked by Nazis from 1920 and 1928, was abducted on March 15 and tortured. The demonstrations against Jewish businesses reached a climax on April 1 with the nationwide boycott. The six department stores were "Aryanised" by 1936, including the fashion house M. Conitzer & Sons on Spitalgasse 19. On the night of November 10, 1938 Jewish shops were destroyed and shop windows smashed. The former synagogue however was left intact. For many of the still 133 members of the Jewish community, arrests followed, with 35 men held in the Angerturnhalle, before more anti-Jewish demonstrations took place. Sixteen people transferred the SA to Hof .In December 1938, the city administration renamed the Judengasse in Marktgasse, the Judentor in Markttor, the Judenberg in Saarlandberg and the Judenbrücke in Itzbrücke. In 1941, 41 Jews still lived in the city, most of whom were forced labourers. 37 Coburg Jews were deported by the Nazi regime leading, on November 19, the Lord Mayor to declare the city of Coburg as "free of Jews." Four Jewish women escaped the deportations because they were married to "German-blooded" men.And the head of the German Red Cross, the Duke of Coburg-Gotha, one of the most violent Nazis, has excellent connections abroad—so excellent, in fact, that when he visited Washington in 1940, when the Germans there were already being boycotted, for the rape of Poland had aroused public opinion against them—he cut quite a figure in Washington society. The Nazis are counting on the duke’s international relations to help them after the war. With him at its head the German Red Cross, they believe, will be able to survive in its present form, since the Allies, or so they fondly hope, will look upon him as a Red Cross official rather than as a Nazi. Thus the German Red Cross would form an ideal front for the coming Nazi underground.
Coburg has named recently named a street after Max Brose, a wealthy businessman who was also a Nazi party member honoured by the Third Reich as a "military industry leader," a move which follows a long campaign in local government by Brose's grandson, Michael Stoschek, who is also the CEO of Brose's mega-company and largest local employer, Brose. The name was passed in a 26-11 vote. Stoschek had been campaigning since 2004 to have his grandfather honoured on a street sign, and stopped almost all of the company's charitable funding to Coburg when the name was rejected nearly ten years ago. Nevertheless Coburg has denied being put under financial pressure in accepting the name. As historian Florian Dierl noted to the Times, Coburg was the first town in Germany to elect a Nazi mayor in 1931, and warned that it should, if anything, be "particularly careful about its past." Josef Schuster, president of the Central Council of Jews in Germany, condemned the naming as "irresponsible."
The
grave of Rudolf Hess was removed in July 2011 after the lease
expired, the body exhumed, cremated and its ashes scattered to end
neo-Nazi pilgrimages. Nevertheless, they continued their annual
marches in Wunsiedel, since then as a "hero commemoration" on the day of
national mourning, organised by the right-wing small party Der III. Weg. On November 15, 2014, the residents of Wunsiedel turned such a march
into “Germany’s most involuntary charity run” under the motto Right
Against Right where the running route was decorated with satirically printed
colourful banners and supporters from the region offered ten euros for
every meter run Exit Germany donated. At the destination, “winners'
certificates” were given to the participants, on which Exit offered them
help in getting out of the right-wing scene.
The empty plot today. After being exhumed Hess's bones were taken to a crematorium,
and his ashes scattered at sea. The action was taken after consultation
with his remaining family. Although his burial here from the start had been seen as curious, Hess's connection to the town had been reinforced by that of his family to Wunsiedel, which is why Rudolf Hess was declared
an honorary citizen of the city of Wunsiedel on September 6, 1933. Although at thebeginning of the Weimar Republic the town was still strongly attached to the USPD and later especially to the Social Democrats, the Nazis developed into the strongest party in the city by 1932. On March 9, 1933, the day of the Reichstag election, former Imperial and Nazi flags were hoisted on the market square and on all public buildings with only the pastors of the two Christian churches refusing to fly flags in their places of worship. In addition, 35 members of the KPD and SPD were imprisoned as "enemies of the state". A few Wunsiedlers were also part of the first transport to the Dachau concentration camp on March 24. 
The location is significant as it lies on the transit route between Nuremberg, the site of the massive party rally held from September 8 to 14, 1936, and the Obersalzberg, Hitler’s private retreat. The stop was deliberately staged near a local war memorial to visually associate the regime with the sacrifice of the German soldiery from the First World War, a common trope in National Socialist iconography.The shooting of this scene was orchestrated by Hoffmann’s atelier, the official photographer of the Nazi Party, whose team travelled with Hitler to capture candid yet controlled images for mass distribution. The presence of Wilhelm Brückner, who served as Hitler’s chief adjutant and was responsible for the Führer’s personal security and household, alongside Julius Schaub, the second adjutant who managed Hitler’s personal staff and travel logistics, indicates that this was a planned pause during a motorcade journey. The composition of the photograph is carefully constructed to show Hitler in a contemplative, almost solitary pose, despite the presence of his staff, reinforcing the narrative of the lonely leader burdened by destiny. The war memorial itself, typically a stone cenotaph or a roll of honour listing the names of the fallen from the local district, serves as a prop to legitimise the Nazi claim as the rightful heir to the military traditions of the German Empire.Historically, 1936 was a pivotal year for the consolidation of Nazi power following the remilitarisation of the Rhineland in March and the successful hosting of the Olympic Games in Berlin during August. The regime was shifting from revolutionary agitation to establishing a dictatorial normality. By photographing Hitler in the rural setting of Middle Franconia, the propaganda machine aimed to present him not just as a Berlin politician, but as a man of the people and a soldier. The specific interaction captured—Hitler pausing to look at the memorial whilst Brückner and Schaub stand slightly behind or to the side—was a recurring visual motif used to suggest that Hitler was paying homage to the war dead, specifically the "blood witnesses" of the movement, even though the memorial likely commemorated regular Wehrmacht soldiers rather than participants in the 1923 Beer Hall Putsch.The publication of this image in the illustrated book, which was printed in the hundreds of thousands and distributed to schools and households, ensured that this specific moment of "private" reflection became public knowledge. The book functioned as a hagiography, stripping away the chaos of the political struggle to present a sanitised, heroic narrative. The choice of Hilpoltstein, a small town with medieval architecture, also tied into the Nazi obsession with "Blood and Soil," linking the leader to the historic German landscape. The technical execution of the shot, likely using a Leica or similar portable camera to maintain a sense of immediacy, captures the texture of the road and the stone memorial, grounding the image in a false realism. This scene, therefore, is not merely a snapshot of a journey but a calculated piece of visual rhetoric designed to embed the image of the war memorial and the concept of sacrifice into the public consciousness alongside the figure of Hitler.
Her association with the festival and her relationship with Hitler lent legitimacy to the regime's cultural agenda. Here on the left is Restaurant Eule, Siegfried Wagner’s favourite restaurant, which Hitler visited during the 1925 Bayreuther Festspiele and my bike parked outside. Winifred's support for Hitler and her efforts to integrate Wagner's music into the ideological framework of the Nazi regime are well-documented by Spotts. According to him, Winifred held a deep-seated admiration for Hitler, sharing his vision of a unified and racially pure German nation. Her commitment to this vision and her willingness to use the Bayreuth Festival to further Nazi ideals played a significant role in establishing the festival as a beacon of Nazi culture. Millington expands on this narrative by discussing how Winifred's influence extended beyond the festival's programming. She was instrumental in maintaining the Wagner-Hitler relationship, using her connections to gain financial support for the festival, even during the war. Through her actions, Winifred ensured the festival's survival and its continued importance as a cultural symbol for the Nazis. The alliance between the Wagner family and the Nazis was thus an essential aspect of the Bayreuth Festival's significance. It served to further legitimise the Nazi regime, portraying it as the true heir to Wagner's cultural vision.
The Haus der Deutschen Erziehung (House of German Education) flying the Nazi flag and its current incarnation with my bike in front. Bayreuth
was intended to have received a so-called Gauforum, a combined government
building and marching square built to symbolise the centre of power in
the town. Bayreuth's first Gauleiter was Hans Schemm, who was also the
head (Reichswalter) of the National Socialist Teachers League, NSLB,
which was located in Bayreuth. The Haus der Deutschen Erziehung, situated at the Hans-Schemm-Platz, later renamed Richard-Wagner-Platz, served as the physical and ideological centre of the National Socialist Teachers' Association and the Reichsschule der NSDAP. The construction of this monumental complex began with the laying of the foundation stone on October 14, 1934, an event attended by Hitler and the Bavarian Minister of Culture Hans Schemm, after whom the square was initially named. The building was designed by the architect Franz Rank, who utilised a severe, cubic style of architecture typical of the regime’s preference for "monumental" structures that conveyed permanence and authority. The complex was not merely an administrative office but a dedicated training academy for the political education of teachers, ensuring that the curriculum in Bavarian schools aligned strictly with National Socialist ideology regarding race, biology, and history.
The official opening of the Haus der Deutschen Erziehung took place on April 22, 1937, coinciding with Hitler’s fifty-eighth birthday and the annual Reichsparteitag of the National Socialist Teachers' League. The structure featured a massive assembly hall capable of seating thousands, which was frequently used for ideological rallies where the "Führer principle" was drilled into the teaching staff. The interior decoration included mosaics and reliefs depicting the struggle of the Nazi movement, specifically highlighting the "blood witnesses" of the party. Adjacent to the main building was a Thingplatz, an open-air amphitheatre designed for mass events, which could accommodate up to twenty thousand people utilised for the "Reichsarbeitsdienst" (RAD) swearing-in ceremonies and for the Hitler Youth, who marched there to receive their banners. The integration of the building with the surrounding open space was a deliberate architectural choice to facilitate the synchronisation of the masses, a concept central to the Nazi aesthetic of community.During the war years, the function of the Haus der Deutschen Erziehung shifted from training to administration and civil defence. As Bayreuth became a "Gauhauptstadt" of high symbolic importance due to its association with Richard Wagner, the building housed the Gauleitung's department for popular education and cultural affairs under Gauleiter Fritz Wächtler. By 1944, as the air war intensified, parts of the complex were repurposed as a military hospital and a command post for the Volkssturm. The building suffered significant damage during the American bombardment of Bayreuth in April 1945, specifically on April 11 and 14, which targeted the railway station and the surrounding government district. Despite the destruction, the reinforced concrete skeleton of the Haus der Deutschen Erziehung remained standing, a testament to the regime’s obsession with durable, fortress-like construction. In the immediate post-war period, the building was occupied by United States forces and subsequently used as a displacement camp for refugees from the East. The American Military Government ordered the removal of all swastika emblems and Nazi iconography from the façade in June 1945, a process documented in the local municipal archives of Bayreuth. The building was eventually repurposed by the Bavarian state government. Today, it houses the regional government of Upper Franconia (Regierung von Oberfranken) and the district administration (Landkreis Bayreuth).
Standing in front of the Rotmainhalle, built in 1935, still adorned with its fresco from the prominent Nazi-era artist Oskar Martin-Amorbach and as it appeared within a sea of swastika flags. The building, although listed as a protected landmark, had been intended to be demolished to provide 20,000 m² of retail space but after significant public protest and the recommendation of a surveyor, the concept was reduced to a 15,000 m² sales area allowing for the preservation of the Rotmainhalle. Today it represents a quintessential example of the architectural and artistic mobilisation of public space in Bayreuth during the National Socialist era. The building was erected as part of the broader "Stadt der Deutschen Erziehung" (City of German Education) complex, a project initiated by the Bavarian Minister of Culture Hans Schemm to transform Bayreuth into a spiritual and administrative centre of the Nazi movement alongside its existing role as the festival city of Richard Wagner. The foundation stone was laid in 1934, and the hall was officially inaugurated on April 20, 1936, coinciding with Hitler’s forty-seventh birthday, an event that drew significant attendance from the Reich leadership and local Gauleiters. The architect Hans Reissinger designed the structure with a functionalist yet imposing façade, utilising local shell limestone to blend with the regional geology while providing a massive interior volume capable of accommodating up to two thousand people for political rallies and cultural events.The interior decoration of the hall was entrusted to Oskar Martin-Amorbach, a prominent artist who held the title of Professor at the Academy of Fine Arts in Munich and was a committed member of the Nazi Party. His work on the Rotmainhalle, specifically a large-scale fresco measuring approximately six by four metres, was commissioned to visually encapsulate the National Socialist concept of the Volksgemeinschaft. Completed in 1936, the fresco depicts a stylised assembly of workers, soldiers, and farmers, rendered in a heroic realism typical of the regime’s approved art. T
he figures are arranged in a pyramidal composition, looking upward towards a central light source or eagle emblem, symbolising the unity of labour and defence under the Führer principle. Art historical analysis from the period, including critiques published in the *Völkischer Beobachter*, praised the work for its "blood and soil" aesthetic, contrasting it with the "degenerate" modernism the regime sought to eradicate. Martin-Amorbach’s use of earthy tones and muscular, idealised physiognomies was intended to inspire a sense of biological and cultural superiority among the viewers.The hall’s function during the Third Reich was strictly aligned with the Gleichschaltung of Bavarian society. It served as the primary venue for the induction ceremonies of the Reichsarbeitsdienst (RAD) units stationed in the region, as well as for the Hitler Youth, specifically the Bann 231. The acoustics and lighting were designed to amplify the oratorical power of speakers, making it a potent tool for propaganda. During the war years, specifically from 1940 onwards, the Rotmainhalle was repurposed for the "Winterhilfswerk" (Winter Relief) collections and as a storage depot for military equipment, though it retained its ceremonial function. Unlike many buildings in Bayreuth, the Rotmainhalle survived the Allied air raids of April 1945 relatively intact, largely because it was situated on the periphery of the main bombing targets which focused on the railway station and the Wagner festival theatre.In the immediate post-war period, the American Military Government classified the building as a "Nazi structure," but due to its robust construction and utility as a public venue, it was not demolished. The fresco, however, presented a significant ideological problem. In 1946, during the denazification process, the mural was whitewashed over by order of the local municipal administration to remove the swastika symbols and the overtly militaristic iconography. For decades, the painting remained hidden beneath layers of neutral paint. It wasn't until the 1980s, during a wave of historical re-evaluation in Bayreuth, that the fresco was uncovered and restored by conservators from the Bavarian State Office for Monument Protection.
According to Siobhan Pat Mulcahy in her book The Peculiar Sex Life of Adolf Hitler
In June/July 1934, [Hitler] organised the murders and imprisonment of hundreds of Nazi Storm Troopers, including their leader “Queen” Ernst Roehm, who was openly gay. But while gay Nazis were being butchered or imprisoned, Hitler was having a clandestine affair with his Munich bodyguard and chauffeur Julius Schreck. The two were apparently devoted to each other and enjoyed romantic trysts at the Hotel Bube near Berneck, the midway point between Berlin and Munich. Their affair lasted until Schreck’s sudden death from meningitis in 1936. Apparently, when he heard the bad news, Hitler wept uncontrollably for several days. He ordered a state funeral for his beloved chauffeur, at which he delivered a personal eulogy, with all the Nazi top brass ordered to attend.
The Hotel Bube in Bad Berneck where Hitler would stay during his pilgrimages to Bayreuth hasn't changed at all.After 1933, other long-established festivals, carnivals and fairs in Germany were similarly transformed into events that openly celebrated the Nazi regime. Their host cities in turn often became loci of Nazi tourist culture. Bayreuth is a good example. Its annual Wagner Festival welcomed Hitler and his entourage every summer; by 1933, the Manchester Guardian was reporting that the event now resembled a ‘Hitler Festival’. During the rest of the year, even when the Festspielhaus sat empty, it attracted Hitler devotees as well as Wagner fans. Tourist material lauded Hitler’s special affection for the town and its operas. Postcards even depicted the Hotel Bube in Bad Berneck, just north of Bayreuth, where he stayed during the festival every year.
Bad Staffelstein am Main

The idea of struggle is as old as life itself, for life is only preserved because other living things perish through struggle. ... In this straggle, the stronger, the more able, win, while the less able, the weak, lose. Struggle is the father of all things. ... It is not by the principles of humanity that man lives or is able to preserve himself above the animal world, but solely by means of the most brutal struggle. ... If you do not fight for life, then life will never be won.
Bullock (36) Hitler: A Study in Tyranny

Strauß, further accused of committing "economic crimes ”, was tried in 1939; as the alleged crimes could not be proven, he was sentenced to eight years in prison" for the crime of racial defilement". During the war Strauss was eventually deported to an extermination camp.The appointment of Hans Schemm as Bavarian Minister of Culture and Gauleiter of the Bavarian Ostmark on March 9, 1933, accelerated this process, as Schemm viewed Kulmbach as the ideal location for the "Stadt der deutschen Erziehung" (City of German Education) alongside Bayreuth. The regime immediately purged the local municipal administration, replacing the sitting mayor with party loyalists to ensure total ideological conformity. The town’s status was formally elevated on May 15, 1934, when it was officially renamed "Hans-Schemm-Stadt," a ceremonial act that underscored its importance as a site of ideological training rather than mere provincial governance.The Plassenburg itself was repurposed with ruthless efficiency to serve the regime’s penal and educational needs. In 1933, the fortress was converted into a "Landesführerschule" for the National Socialist German Workers' Party, designed to indoctrinate future district leaders in the principles of National Socialism. The curriculum focused heavily on racial biology and military strategy, utilising the castle’s imposing architecture to instil a sense of discipline and historical destiny in the trainees. Simultaneously, the Gestapo established a special prison within the castle walls, specifically in the Casemates, to hold political dissidents, trade unionists, and members of the clergy who opposed the regime.
By 1938, the prison population had swelled to over one hundred inmates, subjected to interrogation and isolation in conditions designed to break their will. The dual function of the Plassenburg as both a training ground for the elite and a dungeon for the opposition created a stark physical manifestation of the Nazi dichotomy between the "national comrade" and the "enemy of the state." The architectural integrity of the site was maintained but stripped of its museum character, with exhibits related to the Hohenzollern dynasty replaced by busts of Hitler and swastika banners.As the war progressed and the labour shortage became acute, Kulmbach became a site of brutal exploitation through the establishment of a subcamp of the Flossenbürg concentration camp in the summer of 1944. Located in the district of Metzdorf, this facility housed approximately three hundred and fifty male prisoners, primarily from the Soviet Union and Poland, who were forced to work in the local armaments industry and the railway repair yards. The camp was administered directly by the SS, and the mortality rate was high due to malnutrition and the harsh working conditions, a fact documented in the death registers held by the Arolsen Archives. The presence of the camp was not merely an economic measure but a demonstration of the regime’s racial hierarchy, as the prisoners were visible in the town centre and subjected to public humiliation. Despite the town’s strategic insignificance compared to industrial centres like Nuremberg, Kulmbach was not spared the consequences of total war. On April 11, 1945, only days before the arrival of United States forces, the town suffered a devastating air raid by the Eighth Air Force. The bombing targeted the railway infrastructure and the historic market square, resulting in the destruction of over seventy per cent of the old town’s buildings and the deaths of several hundred civilians. The Plassenburg, however, remained largely intact, serving as the final redoubt for the Volkssturm units before they dispersed into the surrounding forests.The immediate post-war period in Kulmbach was characterised by a complex process of denazification and physical reconstruction, complicated by the sheer volume of party members who had held positions of influence. The American Military Government established a displaced persons camp in the barracks previously used by the Wehrmacht, while the Plassenburg was converted into a youth hostel and a memorial for the victims of the Gestapo prison. The town’s name was reverted to Kulmbach in 1945, but the social scars of the Nazi era persisted for decades. Historical analysis by Wüst highlights that the rapid reintegration of former party members into the local judiciary and teaching profession in the 1950s created a "silence of the perpetrators" that delayed a genuine confrontation with the town’s history until the 1980s. The restoration of the Plassenburg in the 1970s sparked controversy when original Nazi-era mosaics and inscriptions were discovered beneath layers of plaster, leading to a heated debate about whether to preserve them as historical evidence or remove them entirely. Ultimately, the site was sanitised for tourism, yet the structural modifications made by the Nazis, particularly the reinforced doors of the prison cells and the parade grounds, remain as physical evidence of the town’s role in the Third Reich’s machinery of power and repression.

Theresienstein Hof, located north-east of Hof an der Saale, flying the Nazi flag and today which dates from 1816 as one the oldest German citizens' parks and named after Queen Therese Charlotte, the wife of King Ludwig I of Bavaria.
In 1927 a synagogue was erected on the Hallplatz near the old railway station, later to be completely destroyed at the November 1938 pogrom and its inventory burned. This pogrom in Hof began in the early morning hours of November 10 in which the chief officers of the district police officers, the ϟϟ and SA were involved. In addition to the synagogue, retailers and private apartments were the target of the attacks. Of the eighty Jews living in Hof, twelve were arrested. By 1939 only seven Jewish remained. After the Second World War none returned, but some 1,400 Jews ended up stranded within the Moschendorf camp in Hof. It wasn't until 1998 that a former school building in Moschendorf was acquired as a community centre and established as a new synagogue the following year.
In 1945, Hof suffered minor destruction due to aerial attacks. From September 3, 1944 to April 14, 1945, an external subcamp of the Flossenbürg concentration camp existed in the village of Hof-Moschendorf, whose hundred detainees had to perform forced labour for the ϟϟ Hauptzeugamt. The Americans occupied the city on April 15, 1945 on their advance to Eger and West Bohemia. Hof belonged to the American occupation zone until 1955.
[Hitler] summoned about sixty party leaders to a meeting on February 14, 1926 at Bamberg, in Upper Franconia. There was no agenda. Hitler, it was stated, simply wanted to discuss some ‘important questions’. He spoke for two hours. He addressed in the main the issue of foreign policy and future alliances. His position was wholly opposed to that of the Working Community. Alliances were never ideal, he said, but always ‘purely a matter of political business’. Britain and Italy, both distancing themselves from Germany’s arch-enemy France, offered the best potential. Any thought of an alliance with Russia could be ruled out. It would mean ‘the immediate political bolshevisation of Germany’, and with it ‘national suicide’. Germany’s future could be secured solely by acquiring land, by eastern colonisation as in the Middle Ages, by a colonial policy not overseas but in Europe. On the question of the expropriation of German princes without compensation (a proposal by the Left, but supported by north German Nazi leaders), Hitler again ruled out the position of the Working Community. ‘For us there are today no princes, only Germans,’ he declared. ‘We stand on the basis of the law, and will not give a Jewish system of exploitation a legal pretext for the complete plundering of our people.’ Such a rhetorical slant could not conceal the outright rejection of the views of the northern leaders. Finally, Hitler repeated his insistence that religious problems had no part to play in the National Socialist Movement.Goebbels was appalled. ‘I feel devastated. What sort of Hitler? A reactionary? Amazingly clumsy and uncertain ... Probably one of the greatest disappointments of my life. I no longer believe fully in Hitler. That’s the terrible thing: my inner support has been taken away.’Hitler had reasserted his authority. The potential threat from the Working Community had evaporated. Despite some initial signs of defiance, the fate of the Community had been sealed at Bamberg. Gregor Strasser promised Hitler to collect all copies of the draft programme he had distributed, and wrote to members of the Community on 5 March asking for them to be returned. The Community now petered out into non-existence. On 1 July 1926, Hitler signed a directive stating that ‘since the NSDAP represents a large working community, there is no justification for smaller working communities as a combination of individual Gaue’. By that time, Strasser’s Working Community of northern and western Gauleiter was finished. With it went the last obstacle to the complete establishment of Hitler’s supreme mastery over the party.Hitler was shrewd enough to be generous after his Bamberg triumph. By September, Strasser himself had been called to the Reich Leadership as Propaganda Leader of the party, while Franz Pfeffer von Salomon (Gauleiter of Westphalia, a former army officer who had subsequently joined the Freikorps, participated in the Kapp Putsch, and been active in opposition to the French in the Ruhr) was appointed head of the SA. Most important of all, the impressionable Goebbels was openly courted by Hitler and completely won over....The Bamberg meeting had been a milestone in the development of the Nazi party. The Working Community had neither wanted nor attempted a rebellion against Hitler’s leadership. But once Strasser had composed his draft programme, a clash was inevitable. Was the party to be subordinated to a programme, or to its leader? The Bamberg meeting decided what National Socialism was to mean. It was not to mean a party torn, as the völkisch movement had been in 1924, over points of dogma. The Twenty-Five-Point Programme of 1920 was therefore regarded as sufficient. ‘It stays as it is,’ Hitler was reported as saying. ‘The New Testament is also full of contradictions, but that hasn’t prevented the spread of Christianity.’Its symbolic significance, not any practical feasibility was what mattered. Any more precise policy statement would not merely have produced continuing inner dissension. It would have bound Hitler himself to the programme, subordinated him to abstract tenets of doctrine that were open to dispute and alteration. As it was, his position as Leader over the movement was now inviolable.
The wife in front of the Portal des Böttingerhausesand as it appeared during the Third Reich
At Bamberg, too, an important ideological issue – the anti-Russian thrust of foreign policy – had been reaffirmed. The alternative approach of the northern group had been rejected. The ‘idea’ and the Leader were coming to be inseparable. But the ‘idea’ amounted to a set of distant goals, a mission for the future. The only way to it was through the attainment of power. For that, maximum flexibility was needed. No ideological or organisational disputes should in future be allowed to divert from the path. Fanatical willpower, converted into organised mass force, was what was required. That demanded freedom of action for the Leader; and total obedience from the following. What emerged in the aftermath of Bamberg was, therefore, the growth of a new type of political organisation: one subjected to the will of the Leader, who stood over and above the party, the embodiment in his own person of the ‘idea’ of National Socialism.Kershaw (169-171) Hitler

The main square from a Nazi-era postcard and today. Right-wing radicals had already gathered in Forchheim immediately after the First World War and in February 1922 a local Nazi Party group - one of the first in Germany - was founded under the leadership of merchant Gottlieb Kärgelein. Kärgelein was elected to the city council in 1924 and published his own newspaper, Der Streiter, the content of which was adapted to the Nazi newspaper Der Stürmer, which articularly served to agitate against local Jews. There was also a Gauleiter, Hanns Schemm, wo had served as a member of the state parliament in 1928. Hitler spoke in Forchheim on December 15 of that year whilst staying at the Deutscher Hof in Nuremberg. That day he also spoke in Hassfurt, Eltmann, Bamberg, Erlangen, Nürnberg, Schwabach, Roth, Pleinfeld, Ellingen, Weißenburg in Bayern, Eichstätt, Ingolstadt and Reichertshofen.
In March 1930 there was a meeting of both Communists and National Socialists in Forchheim as a result of the formation of the parliamentary minority government by Hindenburg and Brüning, which could only prevail through "emergency ordinances," notably the infamous article 48 giving the president dictatorship powers when circumstances deemed it; they would form the basis later of the powers invested into Hitler as part of the so-called 'Enabling Act' of March, 1933. By then there had been 5.6 million unemployed in Germany in mid-1932 and the deflationary policy ensured that, starting in March, young people could also be deployed in Forchheim into the "voluntary labour service" where they would be involved, for example, in the construction of a toboggan run in the basement forest and sports areas in the municipal outdoor pool. A memorial stone heading towards the town of Serlbach, which has now been mossed, testifies to this. By the time Hitler received his Enabling Act in March 1933, the local newspaper "Forchheimer Zeitung" was banned. The then Mayor Karl Strecker expected that the Nazis wouldn't be satisfied with its representation on the Forchheim City Council and suggested that deputy Mayor Wilhelm Burkard give up his office in favour of a Nazi Party candidate, which he did in an extraordinary secret council meeting on March 20, 1933.
The town’s strategic significance was heightened by the presence of the Stürmer publishing house; whilst Julius Streicher operated primarily from Nuremberg, Forchheim maintained a local editorial office responsible for disseminating the virulently anti-Semitic newspaper throughout Upper Franconia, a fact documented in post-war denazification files held by the Spruchkammer archives. The regime utilised the town’s historic fortress, the Kaiserpfalz, as a symbolic backdrop for state ceremonies, including the annual May Day celebrations where the DAF organised mass rallies to demonstrate the unity of workers and the leadership principle.The persecution of the Jewish community in Forchheim, which numbered approximately one hundred and fifty individuals in 1933, escalated with systematic boycotts of businesses beginning in April 1933, orchestrated by local SA units. The community was forced to sell their properties at deflated prices during the process of Aryanisation, with the synagogue on Hauptstraße being destroyed during the Reichskristallnacht on November 9, 1938, an event recorded in the contemporary police logs of the Gendarmerie station. The site was subsequently cleared, and a fire station was later erected on the rubble. The ideological indoctrination of the youth was centred on the Napola school established in the region, which prepared boys for elite service in the SS, whilst the BDM enforced strict gender roles and biological education for girls.
In 1935, the town hosted a massive Gaulevel rally to commemorate the death of Gauleiter Hans Schemm, who was killed in a plane crash near Bayreuth on March 5, 1935; street names were immediately altered to honour him, and a memorial stone was erected in the castle courtyard, which was removed by US forces in 1945. As the war progressed, Forchheim’s infrastructure was repurposed for the Wehrmacht’s logistical needs. The airfield near the town was expanded to accommodate fighter squadrons defending the Reich against Allied bombing raids, and a subcamp of the Flossenbürg concentration camp was established in 1944 to provide forced labour for armaments production in local factories. Historical records from the International Tracing Service confirm that over three hundred prisoners, primarily from Poland and the Soviet Union, were held under brutal conditions in barracks on the outskirts of the town. The town itself suffered its first major air raid on February 23, 1945, when US bombers targeted the railway marshalling yard, resulting in significant civilian casualties and damage to the historic old town. The final phase of the war saw the town designated as a defensive stronghold, with Volkssturm units, consisting of elderly men and teenage boys, armed with Panzerfausts to resist the advancing US 1st Infantry Division. However, the defence collapsed rapidly, and the town was surrendered without a fight to elements of the US VII Corps on April 14, 1945, following the flight of the local Nazi leadership.
The Nürnberger Gate from a Nazi-era postcard and today. Owing to Forchheim’s fortifications, it got through the Thirty Years' War without being overrun even once. The Prince-Bishop of Bamberg fled the Swedes in this war, seeking shelter for himself, and also for his cathedral treasure, in the strongly defended fortress town of Forchheim. The Swedes laid siege to the town several times from 1632 to 1634. It was also in this era of Forchheim’s history that some of the townsfolk earned the rather unflattering nickname Mauerscheißer (“wall shitters”). This came from their practice of defecating over the city walls during the siege, to demonstrate to the Swedes that there was still enough to eat in the city, and that their siege was ineffective and pointless. On September 6, 1802, Forchheim was occupied by Bavarian troops and annexed to the Electorate of Bavaria. In 1889, the year of Hitler's birth, Forchheim became a kreisfreie Stadt, conferring on it certain enhanced local powers. As an aside, local lore has it that Forchheim was Pontius Pilate’s birthplace. The town’s small Jewish community, which had resided in the region since the 16th century, faced systematic exclusion following the enactment of the Nuremberg Laws on September 15, 1935. This legal marginalisation culminated in the violence of Kristallnacht on November 9, 1938, when the local synagogue was desecrated and destroyed by SA units, an event recorded in the gendarmerie logs of the district. The male Jewish residents were subsequently deported to concentration camps, effectively erasing the community’s presence by 1942.
During the war, 1,790 forced labourers were employed in the Pegnitz plant of the Amag-Hilpert-Pegnitzhütte. As manpower shortages intensified, the Nazis established a subcamp dependent on the Flossenbürg concentration camp system in 1944 to supply forced labour. Historical records indicate that foreign workers and prisoners of war were housed in barracks near the railway station and subjected to harsh working conditions in the local industry. The town’s strategic position as a railway junction made it a target for Allied air raids in the final months of the conflict, resulting in damage to the station and surrounding residential areas. Pegnitz was occupied by units of the United States Army on April 14, 1945, following the collapse of the Wehrmacht’s defensive lines in Franconia. The post-war period involved the removal of Nazi insignia from public buildings and the denazification of the local civil service. When the war ended, the town quickly grew to be a medium-sized centre with roughly 14,000 inhabitants.
Münchberg
This was built in the mid 1930s to honour the war dead of the Great War. The Nazi eagle has long since been removed.
Gefrees
By 1942, the town was declared judenfrei by the Nazis, having successfully deported its remaining Jewish citizens to the extermination camps in the East.As the war progressed, Gefrees became a site of forced labour exploitation due to its location in Upper Franconia. In the summer of 1944, a subcamp of the Flossenbürg concentration camp was established on the outskirts of the town to house prisoners working in the local armaments industry and clearing rubble from bombing raids. The camp apparently held about 250 male prisoners, primarily from the Soviet Union and Poland, who were subjected to gruelling work shifts in the textile factories converted for war production. The mortality rate in the camp was high, exacerbated by malnutrition and the harsh winter of 1944 to 1945. The final phase of the war brought significant destruction to Gefrees.
Finally on April 14, 1945, as units of the United States Army advanced through Franconia, the town was subjected to artillery fire, resulting in the destruction of several residential buildings and the railway viaduct. Despite the presence of Volkssturm units, the town was surrendered without a fight to the US 11th Armored Division. The post-war period saw the arrival of hundreds of refugees from the Sudetenland and Silesia, significantly altering the demographic makeup of the town.
![]() |
| The town synagogue in 1935 |























.gif)

















